- Home
- Why Border Disruptions Threaten Blood-Derived Raw Materials—and What Biomanufacturers Can Do About It
Why Border Disruptions Threaten Blood-Derived Raw Materials—and What Biomanufacturers Can Do About It
Published on 24 June 2025
Reading time: 4 minutes
What happens when your biologics pipeline depends on the reliability of an international border?
For many manufacturers still using plasma-derived components like albumin or transferrin, that’s not a hypothetical. It’s baked into their supply chain.
Across the U.S.–Mexico border, more than 50 plasma centers depend on daily crossings from Mexican nationals to maintain a steady supply of plasma, a critical ingredient in biologics manufacturing. These dynamics play a major role in today’s blood plasma shortages and the instability of the global albumin supply chain. When the border tightens, the supply falters. During COVID-19, donations dropped dramatically. Prices soared. Production timelines slipped. Sound familiar?
This article breaks down the risks of relying on plasma from border-region donors and why it might be time to rethink your raw materials.
Real-World Supply Risk: Border Dependency Creates a Bottleneck 
Let’s start with the numbers:
- Over 50 plasma centers are located within 50 miles of the U.S.–Mexico border.
- Many are strategically placed by companies like Grifols and CSL Plasma to target cross-border donors.
Why? Because U.S. law allows non-citizens with Border Crossing Cards to sell plasma, even though it’s illegal in Mexico.
Here’s the issue:
- These centers rely on daily donor crossings.
- A policy shift, legal challenge, or public health crisis can shut that down overnight.
- We’ve seen it happen. COVID-era restrictions caused caused a steep drop in plasma supply, intensifying the ongoing blood plasma shortage and creating procurement challenges for plasma-derived protein.
“This isn’t just a logistics issue. It’s a vulnerability embedded in your raw materials.” — Caroline Chen, Investigative Reporter, ProPublica
Regulatory and Ethical Exposure: Legal Loophole, Ethical Minefield
The system operates in a regulatory gray zone:
U.S. law prohibits non-citizens from selling whole blood—but plasma is treated differently. Under current rules, non-residents with Border Crossing Cards can donate plasma up to twice a week, so long as they meet minimum health and identification criteria. This loophole has enabled the growth of a border-dependent donor economy.
Here’s how it works:
- Many Mexican nationals living in low-income communities cross into U.S. border towns multiple times per week to sell plasma.
- Compensation typically ranges from $30 to $50 per donation—an amount that can significantly impact someone earning below the poverty line in Mexico.
- Companies like Grifols and CSL Plasma have built dozens of centers near the border to capitalize on this labor pool.
The consequences?
- Ethical concerns about coercion and informed consent: While legal, this practice raises difficult questions about whether individuals are donating voluntarily or out of economic desperation.
- Exploitation risks: Targeting financially vulnerable populations to extract biological materials—repeatedly, and for profit—blurs the line between compensation and commodification.
- Systemic fragility: When border policies change or donor eligibility tightens, supply drops overnight—as seen in 2021 when U.S. Customs began restricting donor entry.
- Legal volatility: Ongoing lawsuits from Grifols and CSL against the U.S. government underscore just how fragile and contested this sourcing strategy really is.
These weak points stack onto the existing risks of blood-derived raw materials—variability, regulatory exposure, and limited scalability.
“You’re essentially building your global biologics strategy on the backs of vulnerable populations.” — Dr. Lisa Eckenwiler, Bioethicist, George Mason University
Implications for Biomanufacturing: From Variability to Vulnerability
Still using blood-derived albumin?
In an industry increasingly moving toward animal-origin-free (and human-origin-free) biomanufacturing, relying on donor-based materials is an outdated liability.
Here’s what that exposes you to:
- Supply chain volatility tied to immigration, customs, and cross-border policy.
- Donor inconsistency that impacts performance, purification, and regulatory filing.
- Traceability concerns as regulators increase scrutiny on human-derived raw material.
These aren’t theoretical risks. They’re showing up in:
- Batch failure investigations
- Delayed IND submissions
- Quality audits asking tough questions about material sourcing
Historical Perspective: Plasma Supply is More Fragile Than It Looks
Disruptions in plasma availability aren’t new—and they’re not always caused by pandemics. The table below shows how regulatory decisions, production failures, demand spikes, and international dependencies have repeatedly strained global plasma supply:
Historical Disruptions in Plasma Supply (1975–2025)
🛑 Regulatory Issues Policy decisions that restrict donors or products |
|
🚧 Supply Chain Failures Breakdowns in collection, production, or distribution |
|
📈 Medical Demand Surges Clinical use increases faster than supply |
|
🌍 International Dependency Reliance on plasma from a few major suppliers |
|
📉 Donor Demographic Shifts Decline in long-term donor participation |
|
Why Recombinant Alternatives Matter: Build Resilience into Your Process
This is where recombinant, animal-origin-free raw-materials change the game.
All InVitria’s recombinant human albumin and cell culture supplements are:
- Manufactured under cGMP
- Lot-to-lot consistent
- Free of donor dependencies
- Exempt from blood safety regulations
- Scalable from grams to metric TONS
- Ethically sourced and sustainable
That means:
- No exposure to border policy shifts
- No reliance on human donor networks
- No hidden ethical or regulatory risks
“Beyond quality, InVitrias recombinant solutions eliminate major sourcing liabilities.” — Scott Deeter, CEO, InVitria.
So what’s the takeaway?
If you’re still sourcing plasma-derived raw materials, you’re inheriting all the risk that comes with them: regulatory scrutiny, supply instability, and ethical uncertainty. Whether you’re facing a plasma-derived albumin shortage or broader concerns with the albumin supply chain, shifting to recombinant albumin isn’t just safer—it’s smarter.
Recombinant materials give you control. They future-proof your process. And they eliminate dependence on a supply chain built on fragile infrastructure and vulnerable donors.
It’s time to rethink your raw materials.
Talk with us about moving to recombinant.
Featured Solution
Optibumin 25 ® – Recombinant Human Serum Albumin in Bags
Optibumin 25, available in bottles and bags supports closed-system biomanufacturing with enhanced safety, consistency, and scalability. This high-purity, recombinant, animal-free albumin solution eliminates contamination risks from animal- and human-derived materials, ideal for advanced cell therapy and vaccine workflows. Its chemically defined formulation promotes stable cell growth, viability, and process reliability.
Footnotes
Reference
- Chen, C. (2022, October 13). Pharma companies sue for the right to buy blood from Mexicans along border. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/pharma-companies-sue-for-the-right-to-buy-blood-from-mexicans-along-border
- European Medicines Agency. (2023). ICH guideline Q5A(R2) on viral safety evaluation of biotechnology products derived from cell lines of human or animal origin. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/ich-q5ar2-viral-safety-evaluation-biotech-products
- Grifols S.A., & CSL Plasma. (2022). Plaintiffs’ complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief [Court document]. U.S. District Court, District of Columbia.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Improving the resilience of the plasma supply chain. https://www.oecd.org/health/improving-resilience-of-the-plasma-supply-chain.pdf
- Plasma Protein Therapeutics Association. (2021). Plasma collection: Essential and safe. https://www.pptaglobal.org/plasma/plasma-protein-therapies/plasma-collection
- ProPublica. (2021, August 12). Pharmaceutical companies are luring Mexicans across the U.S. border to donate blood plasma. https://www.propublica.org/article/pharmaceutical-companies-are-luring-mexicans-across-the-u-s-border-to-donate-blood-plasma
- Petry, N. M. (2005). The effects of monetary reinforcement on plasma donation frequency. Transfusion, 45(5), 806–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.04366.x
- U.S. Customs and Border Protection. (2021, June). CBP statement on enforcement of plasma donation policy [Press release]. https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2020). Guidance for industry: Characterization and qualification of cell substrates and other biological materials used in the production of viral vaccines for infectious disease indications. https://www.fda.gov/media/78428/download
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2022). CBER annual report 2021. Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. https://www.fda.gov/media/157037/download
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023). Guidance for industry: Source plasma donor eligibility. https://www.fda.gov/media/70935/download
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023). List of FDA-licensed blood establishments. https://www.fda.gov
- World Health Organization. (2022). Annex 4: Recommendations for the production, control and regulation of human plasma for fractionation. WHO Technical Report Series, No. 1024. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/trs-1024-annex-4
- World Health Organization. (2022). Global status report on blood safety and availability. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240058269